NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Safety pros: Do you have to fight the perception among front-line workers that safety is “uncool”?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, oil and gas
  • Office safety tips
  • Safety for health care workers
  • Transportation
  • Worker health and wellness
  • Subscribe today
    Bus/limo/taxi | Advocacy groups | Trucking

    Safety group opposes federal truck weight, size increases

    April 16, 2014

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – The Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety has announced its opposition to any increases in federal truck size and weight limits due to concerns about alleged flaws in an upcoming government study on the increases.

    A surface transportation funding bill signed into law in July 2012, known as MAP-21, required the Department of Transportation to conduct research within a 24-month period on the safety and infrastructure impacts of allowing heavier and larger trucks on highways. At press time, the study was scheduled for release in November.

    During an April 9 press conference, Advocates – which was joined by trucking industry stakeholders and Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) – questioned whether the study would provide accurate data after a peer review concluded that the study’s research methodology was flawed. That report, from the National Research Council’s Transportation Research Board, stated that DOT selected inappropriate data analysis methods and truck configurations to study and asserted that the 24-month time constraint did not allow enough time for adequate planning.

    The press conference attendees requested that DOT address the study’s alleged flaws before Congress makes any conclusions on whether the limits should be increased.