NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Is the term "accident" acceptable, or should "incident" always be used?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today
    Combustible dust | Video

    CSB report renews call for a combustible dust standard

    July 17, 2014

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Charleston, WV – A number of combustible dust-related incidents, injuries and deaths over the past decade might have been prevented had OSHA promulgated a standard covering the hazard, according to a Chemical Safety Board report released July 16.

    The report analyzes a metal dust explosion and fire that killed three workers and injured a contractor at West Virginia scrap metal processor AL Solutions on Dec. 9, 2010. It also reiterates CSB’s recommendation for OSHA to issue a combustible dust standard – a suggestion first made in 2006.

    In 2009, OSHA released an advance notice of proposed rulemaking on combustible dust following a 2008 explosion that killed at least 14 people at the Imperial Sugar refinery in Port Wentworth, GA. According to the current regulatory agenda, OSHA intends to initiate a review panel on the proposed rule in December, as required under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.