NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Do you believe most underrecording of injuries is unintentional or deliberate?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote Results

Researchers examine ‘alternative’ safety methods for motor fleets

February 1, 2011

Tags
  • / Print
  • Reprints
  • Text Size:
    A A

Arlington, VA – Large motor fleets working to improve safety outcomes could benefit from “alternative compliance” fleet safety tools used by smaller fleets, according to a report (.pdf file) released in January by the American Transportation Research Institute.

ATRI researchers analyzed safety performance data associated with traditional and non-traditional safety tools, programs and strategies to find out “whether current regulatory requirements, safety metrics and evaluation tools completely and accurately depict a carrier’s safety performance.”

Alternative compliance tools included the Employer Notification System, electronic onboard recorders, fatigue management programs, commercial driver drug and alcohol testing using hair, simulator-based training, speed limiters or governors, and forward collision warning systems.

Researchers suggested a pilot study be conducted to further assess differences between crash rates by carrier sizes and the impact different alternative compliance tools would have on safety outcomes.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.