NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Has an employer ever asked you to do something that violated your code of ethics as a safety professional?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    Senators propose bill to combat drunk driving

    January 14, 2010

    Tags
    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Sens. Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ) and Tom Udall (D-NM) on Dec. 21 proposed legislation that, beginning in 2012, would withhold transportation funding from states that do not enact laws requiring installation of alcohol ignition interlocks on the vehicles of convicted drunk drivers.

    The Drunk Driving Repeat Offender Prevention Act of 2009 (S. 2920) would require the devices to be in place for a minimum of six months following a drunk driver's conviction. Alcohol ignition interlocks prevent a vehicle's engine from starting if the driver's breath reveals an alcohol level above the legal limit.

    States failing to comply would have a percentage of federal transportation funding withheld each fiscal year: 1 percent in 2012; 3 percent in 2013; and 5 percent in 2014 and each fiscal year thereafter. Ten states currently have laws that require an ignition interlock for all convicted drunk driving: Alaska, Arkansas, Hawaii, Louisiana, New Mexico, Arizona, Utah, Nebraska, Washington and New York.



    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.