NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Has an employer ever asked you to do something that violated your code of ethics as a safety professional?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    DOT outlines FY 2011 budget request for FMCSA

    February 11, 2010

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    The Department of Transportation recently released a summary (.pdf file) of its fiscal year 2011 budget request for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. DOT officials are asking for $570 million for FMCSA's programs -- a $20 million increase from FY 2010 levels.

    A summary of proposed expenditures includes:

    • Approximately $13 million for operating expenses to allow FMCSA to fully deploy its Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010 initiative, including resources for enforcement, monitoring and training. Funds also will go toward hiring additional motor carrier safety inspectors and personnel.
    • A $7.3 million increase in information management funding to allow FMCSA to upgrade its information technology systems to provide new functionality associated with activities related to new entrants, e-Gov and COMPASS.
    • About $8 million to be redirected from the Commercial Driver's License Information System grants to new entrant grants and CDL improvement grants.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.