NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Should employers' injury and illness data be made public?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results


Does your CEO 'Get it?'

Tell us why on the submission form and your CEO could appear among the 2017 selections.

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    Change to hex chrome standard to go into effect

    May 20, 2010

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    An amendment to OSHA's hexavalent chromium standard requiring broader employee notification of exposures is scheduled to go into effect June 15.

    Announced May 14, the direct final rule amends the four-year-old standard to require employers to inform affected workers of all exposures to hex chrome, regardless of whether the exposures fall above or below the permissible exposure limit.

    In the original 2006 hex chrome rule, employers only had to notify workers when the exposure exceeded the PEL. This, along with other provisions of the original final rule, was petitioned by several stakeholder groups before the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Although most of the case against OSHA was turned away -- including a petition to strengthen the PEL -- the court ordered the agency to re-examine the employee notification provision. In response, OSHA decided to amend the standard with the direct final rule.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.