NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Is the term "accident" acceptable, or should "incident" always be used?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    Congress examines effects of CSA 2010

    July 1, 2010

    Tags
    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's new commercial motor vehicle safety enforcement program, Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010, was both praised and criticized by safety advocates and trucking groups during a June 23 hearing before the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee's Highways and Transit Subcommittee.

    Concerns about CSA 2010 included the processes used to rate motor carriers and drivers, how different types of carriers would compare to one other, how violations would be weighted and tracked, and how the system would differentiate between citations and warnings.

    FMCSA Administrator Anne S. Ferro said a new Safety Measurement System would be used to rate and rank carriers within CSA 2010 to determine which carriers warrant an intervention and possible enforcement action by her agency. She emphasized the system would draw on all available data, including violations and positive data, such as a carrier that passes an inspection at a weight station.



    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.