NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Should all workers have the right to earn paid sick leave?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results


 

Does your CEO 'Get it?'

Tell us why on the submission form and your CEO could appear among the 2017 selections.

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    OSHA to stakeholders: Which PELs should be updated first?

    August 19, 2010

    Tags
    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    OSHA this week announced it is seeking input from stakeholders on which chemicals should receive priority for updating permissible exposure limits.

    Noting many PELs are based on science that is nearly 60 years old and are inadequate to protect today's workers, OSHA administrator David Michaels asked for help in identifying chemicals to focus on. "We must assure the protection of workers currently exposed to well-recognized chemical hazards for which we have an inadequate PEL or no PEL at all," Michaels said in a press release.

    In the first two years of OSHA's existence, the agency established 400 PELs, according to the agency. Since then, OSHA has established PELs for only 29 chemicals, and most PELs have remained unchanged despite NIOSH and consensus organizations strengthening their own recommended exposure limits.

    Chemical nominations are being accepted until Aug. 27.



    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.