NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Do you believe most underrecording of injuries is unintentional or deliberate?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote Results

OIG questions OSHA's penalty reductions

October 7, 2010

Tags
  • / Print
  • Reprints
  • Text Size:
    A A

More than $350 million in OSHA penalty reductions in a two-year period has not been effectively evaluated, and 36 percent of those reductions may have been inappropriately granted, according to a Department of Labor Office of Inspector General audit (.pdf file) released Sept. 30.

The audit covers nearly 50,000 federal OSHA inspections between July 2007 and June 2009 that resulted in $523.5 million in penalties, later reduced to $351.2 million.

OSHA must consider an employer's size, good faith and history when proposing penalty amounts. The agency often reduces penalties as an incentive for employers to correct violations and improve workplace safety, as well as avoid a contest that would delay abatement, according to the report. OIG suggested OSHA has not committed resources to evaluate using such penalty reductions and their impact on workplace safety and health.

In response, OSHA administrator David Michaels took issue with some of the findings, noting certain reductions are statutorily required, and penalties cannot be assessed independently of contest rates. He added that his agency is working on new criteria for penalty calculations.



Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.