NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Is “zero injuries” a realistic goal?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote Results

OSHA seeks to define 'feasible' controls in noise standard

October 21, 2010

Tags
  • / Print
  • Reprints
  • Text Size:
    A A

OSHA is seeking comment by Dec. 20 on its official interpretation of the term "feasible administrative or engineering controls," as used in the occupational noise standard.

OSHA's noise standard directs employers to use "feasible administrative or engineering controls" to reduce noise to acceptable levels, and personal protective equipment such as earplugs as supplements when controls are not completely effective. However, OSHA currently cites employers for failure to use controls only when hearing protectors are ineffective or controls cost less than a hearing conservation program.

Under the proposed interpretation (.pdf file), the meaning of "feasible" would be consistent with its usual definition -- "capable of being done." OSHA also would change its enforcement policy to authorize issuing citations requiring the use of administrative and engineering controls as long as the cost does not threaten the employer's ability to remain in business.



Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.