NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Safety pros: Do you have to fight the perception among front-line workers that safety is “uncool”?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, oil and gas
  • Office safety tips
  • Safety for health care workers
  • Transportation
  • Worker health and wellness
  • Subscribe today

    EPA backlog presents public health risk: report

    November 18, 2010

    Tags
    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    The Environmental Protection Agency's process for evaluating the health hazards of chemicals is plagued with problems that leave the public at risk, according to a report issued this week by the Center for Progressive Reform, a public health and environmental protection group.

    Despite announcing plans to reform the process 18 months ago, EPA has failed to meet statutory requirements to assess the health hazards of 255 chemicals. Washington-based CPR claims this failure has, in turn, halted regulatory action to protect the public from the potential risks of exposure, including cancer, birth defects and other health problems.

    EPA's Integrated Risk Information System has fallen years behind in conducting chemical assessments. According to the report, if the current pace continues, it will take the agency 55 years to get through its backlog of assessments.

    EPA said it is reviewing the report and undergoing efforts to update and streamline IRIS.



    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.