NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Should employers' injury and illness data be made public?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    House subcommittee hearing examines workers' compensation issues

    November 18, 2010

    Tags
    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Prompted by recent "disturbing national trends," a Congressional subcommittee on Wednesday examined state-run workers' compensation programs and their effect on injured workers.

    For about 20 years, changes in state workers' comp laws have resulted in stricter eligibility requirements for injured workers, as well as a reduction in both amount and duration of benefits, according to Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA), chair of the Education and Labor Committee's Workforce Protections Subcommittee. As a result, costs have shifted from workers' comp programs to Medicare, Social Security Disability Insurance and private health insurance.

    In her introductory comments, Woolsey also took aim at the American Medical Association's "Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment." The most recent edition of the Guides has "dramatically" reduced the impairment ratings for many types of conditions, Woolsey said.

    The Guides is a system determining impairment of medical functionality, and is not synonymous with disabilities and loss of wages, according to the testimony of W. Frederick Uehlein, chairman of the Framingham, MA-based Insurance Recovery Group.

    Emily Spieler, dean of the Northeastern University School of Law in Boston, warned committee members that an increasing number of state workers' comp programs are using the Guides' impairment ratings as a proxy for rating disability.



    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.