NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Should employers' injury and illness data be made public?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results


 

Does your CEO 'Get it?'

Tell us why on the submission form and your CEO could appear among the 2017 selections.

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    OSHA directive clarifies employer responsibility for PPE

    February 17, 2011

    Tags
    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – OSHA recently issued a directive for enforcement personnel on determining compliance with OSHA personal protective equipment standards.

    Enforcement Guidance for Personal Protective Equipment in General Industry (.pdf file) went into effect Feb. 10 and replaces inspection guidelines issued in June 1995.

    The new directive explains when employers do and do not have to pay for PPE, and updates enforcement policies based on court and review commission decisions. It also includes guidance allowing employers to use PPE made in accordance with current consensus standards.

    A final rule issued in November 2007 requires employers in general industry, longshoring, marine terminals and construction to provide most types of required PPE at no cost to workers. OSHA also issued a final rule in September 2009 making PPE standards more consistent with consensus standards.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.