NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Should employers' injury and illness data be made public?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    OIG releases semiannual report

    June 2, 2011

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – The Department of Labor Office of Inspector General released its semiannual report (.pdf file) to Congress May 31, highlighting results from audits conducted during a six-month period.

    The report covers the period of Oct. 1, 2010, to March 31, 2011, and includes highlights from the following audits:

    • OSHA determining (.pdf file) whether State Plans were “at least as effective” in improving workplace safety and health as federal OSHA programs
    • Whistleblower protection program complaints (.pdf file)
    • Extended analysis of MSHA pattern of significant and substantial violation rates (.pdf file)
    • MSHA’s controls over contracting (.pdf file)

    OIG also listed some “significant concerns,” including OSHA’s ability to effectively target resources and measure the agency’s own efforts. An audit (.pdf file) released Sept. 30, 2010, found OSHA has not effectively evaluated the penalty reductions it rewards as incentives to reduce occupational hazards.

    Another area of concern noted in the report was the Mine Safety and Health Administration’s “weak oversight, inadequate policies, and a lack of accountability.” In an audit released Sept. 29, 2010, OIG found (.pdf file) MSHA has never successfully used its pattern-of-violations authority in 32 years.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.