NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Should employers' injury and illness data be made public?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    North Carolina makes the C-DAC rule its own

    April 1, 2010

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    The plan was to wait for OSHA to issue a final rule, but pressure from construction companies and a spate of crane collapses across the country prompted North Carolina to enact the proposed federal crane rule before it becomes official. “We just weren’t willing to wait any longer because it seemed to be taking an inordinate amount of time to get that standard out,” said Kevin Beauregard, assistant director of the North Carolina Occupational Safety and Health Division.

    He said the state went through the rulemaking process last year after meeting with local industry stakeholders. The rule went into effect Oct. 1. “I think part of the reason why the rulemaking process went fairly quickly and was streamlined is that we involved industry from the beginning,” he said.

    North Carolina’s rule is essentially the same document created by OSHA’s Cranes and Derricks Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee, except it has been reformatted to meet state requirements and lawmakers replaced any language they considered ambiguous, according to Beauregard.

    He said officials will look at the final federal rule when it comes out. For now, though, they are concentrating on providing training on the standard. At least 10 classes have already taken place, resulting in the training of 400-500 people. It is too early to evaluate the rule’s impact, but Beauregard has observed an increase in operator training. He estimated 17 violations have been issued since the rule went into effect. “I think that we’re encouraged by the positive comments that we’ve received from industry,” he said.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.