NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Is the term "accident" acceptable, or should "incident" always be used?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    NIOSH: Not enough evidence to link cancer to 9/11

    August 3, 2011

    Tags
    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – A new report from NIOSH found “insufficient evidence” linking cancer to the list of health conditions related to the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

    Published July 26, NIOSH’s review (.pdf file) of scientific and medical literature determined little evidence exists supporting a link between cancer and exposure to the toxic dust at the World Trade Center site. That means cancer will not be included on the list of diseases covered under the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act (H.R. 847), which took effect in July.

    Although the review did not find sufficient evidence at this time, NIOSH said the lack of evidence does not rule out a causal relationship between the exposure and cancer.

    NIOSH is expected to conduct another review in early to mid-2012.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.