NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Safety pros: Do you feel a sense of personal responsibility when a worker injury occurs?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote Results

Appellate court vacates electronic onboard recorders rule

September 14, 2011

Tags
  • / Print
  • Reprints
  • Text Size:
    A A

Chicago – A federal appellate court has overturned a 2010 final rule requiring repeat violators of hours-of-service rules to use electronic onboard recorders.

The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Aug. 26 that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s rule ignored a statute requiring that EOBR regulations ensure the devices cannot be used to harass drivers. The court remanded the rule back to FMCSA.

Opponents of EOBRs called the decision a “triumph.”

“Such a mandate would be a step backward in the effort toward highway safety and is an overly burdensome regulation that simply runs up costs for the majority of trucking, which is small business,” Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Executive Vice President Todd Spencer said in a press release.

Grain Valley, MO-based OOIDA had challenged the regulation in court by arguing the harassment aspect, that a cost-benefit analysis did not show the technology’s benefits, and that EOBRs violate the Fourth Amendment.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.