NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

During your career as a safety professional, has a worker death ever occurred at your site?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote Results

Does your CEO 'Get it?'

Tell us why on the submission form and your CEO could appear among the 2016 selections.

Appellate court vacates electronic onboard recorders rule

September 14, 2011

  • / Print
  • Reprints
  • Text Size:
    A A

Chicago – A federal appellate court has overturned a 2010 final rule requiring repeat violators of hours-of-service rules to use electronic onboard recorders.

The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Aug. 26 that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s rule ignored a statute requiring that EOBR regulations ensure the devices cannot be used to harass drivers. The court remanded the rule back to FMCSA.

Opponents of EOBRs called the decision a “triumph.”

“Such a mandate would be a step backward in the effort toward highway safety and is an overly burdensome regulation that simply runs up costs for the majority of trucking, which is small business,” Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Executive Vice President Todd Spencer said in a press release.

Grain Valley, MO-based OOIDA had challenged the regulation in court by arguing the harassment aspect, that a cost-benefit analysis did not show the technology’s benefits, and that EOBRs violate the Fourth Amendment.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.