NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Has an employer ever asked you to do something that violated your code of ethics as a safety professional?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    Poor risk assessment contributed to BP spill: report

    September 21, 2011

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – BP, Transocean and Halliburton share the blame for the fatal explosion of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig last year, but BP’s decision-making was a key contributing factor to the explosion, according to a new report from the Coast Guard and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement. The April 20, 2010, explosion killed 11 crewmembers and unleashed millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

    Released Sept. 14, the report (.pdf file) found that BP made decisions to save money and time without regard to risk. Contractors Transocean (which owned the rig) and Halliburton (which led cementing operations) also made mistakes, and all three violated federal regulations, the report said.

    The findings line up with the January report (large .pdf file) from the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling.

    In related news, BOEMRE on Sept. 13 issued a proposed rule (.pdf file) to reduce incidents, injuries, and spills from oil and natural gas exploration. The proposed safety and environment management systems rule is part of a series of reforms undertaken by the Department of the Interior after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

    Comments on the proposed rule are due Nov. 14.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.