NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Safety pros: Do you have to fight the perception among front-line workers that safety is “uncool”?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, oil and gas
  • Office safety tips
  • Safety for health care workers
  • Transportation
  • Worker health and wellness
  • Subscribe today

    Lawmakers to NIOSH: Reconsider covering cancer for 9/11 responders

    September 21, 2011

    Tags
    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    New York – Nine New York lawmakers filed a petition Sept. 7 requiring NIOSH Director and 9/11 Health Program Administrator John Howard to consider within 60 days adding cancer to the list of diseases covered under the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act.

    The petition follows a study published in the Sept. 1 issue of The Lancet that found a higher risk of melanoma, thyroid and prostate cancer, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma among firefighters who worked at the World Trade Center site, and an overall increase in cancers among WTC-exposed firefighters.

    However, NIOSH previously announced in July that cancer would not be covered after a review (.pdf file) of available research failed to prove a causal relationship between cancer and 9/11 exposure.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.