NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Has an employer ever asked you to do something that violated your code of ethics as a safety professional?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    Senate bill proposes OSHA, MSHA budgets to remain flat for FY 2013

    June 20, 2012

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – Next fiscal year’s budgets for OSHA and the Mine Safety and Health Administration would remain nearly identical to the current year, according to legislation recently approved by a Senate committee.

    The appropriations bill (S. 3295) (.pdf file) for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and related agencies would fund OSHA at $565.5 million and MSHA at $376.3 million between Oct. 1, 2012, and Sept. 30, 2013. Compared to the FY 2012 budgets, these figures represent about a half-million-dollar budget reduction for OSHA and a nearly $2 million increase for MSHA. DOL as a whole would see its budget decreased to $12.3 billion in FY 2013 from $14.5 billion in FY 2012.

    The Senate Appropriations Committee passed the bill June 14 in a 16-14 vote that fell along strict partisan lines. At press time, the bill was awaiting a vote in the full Senate, and the House had not yet introduced similar legislation.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.