NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Is the term "accident" acceptable, or should "incident" always be used?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    Gov't should develop sleep disorder screening through rulemaking, trucking association suggests

    October 17, 2012

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Las Vegas – Government decisions on screening commercial motor vehicle drivers for sleep disorders should be made through rulemaking, which requires cost-benefit analysis, and not "through the publication of regulatory guidance," according to a new policy statement from the Arlington, VA-based American Trucking Associations.

    The policy statement also recommends that efforts to address sleep disorders focus on conditions that post “substantially elevated crash risk” determined by a science-based process. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Committee met in February to discuss potential rulemakings for screening truck drivers for obstructive sleep apnea, a sleep disorder that has been linked to increased fatigue behind the wheel.

    ATA said any new rules should be cost-beneficial and focus on providing drivers with effective treatments.

    The policy statement was announced Oct. 10 at ATA’s annual Management Conference & Exhibition.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.