NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Is the term "accident" acceptable, or should "incident" always be used?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    New House bill seeks to codify VPP

    February 20, 2013

    Tags
    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – Noting the success of the Voluntary Protection Programs, two lawmakers on Feb. 13 introduced bipartisan legislation to establish the program as a permanent fixture at OSHA.

    H.R. 632, introduced by Reps. Tom Petri (R-WI) and Gene Green (D-TX), would codify VPP and expand it to include more small businesses. VPP recognizes employers with effective safety management programs, as well as injury and illness rates below the industry average. Employers in the program are exempt from routine OSHA inspections. The Department of Labor currently is not required by law to run VPP, and the program is subject to possible elimination due to budget cuts.

    In a statement, the legislators noted VPP’s unique support among unions and non-unionized labor, and how the program provides a balanced approach between businesses and OSHA.

    Similar legislation was introduced in previous Congresses but never passed out of committee.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.