NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Should employers' injury and illness data be made public?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results


 

Does your CEO 'Get it?'

Tell us why on the submission form and your CEO could appear among the 2017 selections.

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today
    Air | Federal agencies

    FAA should improve safety inspector staffing methods, OIG says

    June 27, 2013

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – The Federal Aviation Administration’s current staffing model is unable to adequately determine where to assign safety inspectors, concludes a report released June 20 by the Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General.

    A 2006 congressionally mandated National Research Council study determined that FAA’s safety inspector staffing methods were ineffective, and in October 2009 FAA introduced its current staffing model. The OIG report states that the 2009 model uses “incomplete, inaccurate and outdated data” and does not address all of NRC’s recommendations, including establishing performance measures for effectiveness and capturing safety inspector buy-in.

    OIG made seven recommendations to FAA, including increasing safety inspector training and correcting the model’s data limitations. FAA concurred with six recommendations and partially concurred with one, and OIG stated it will evaluate some of FAA’s ongoing improvement efforts on the recommendations.