NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Should all workers have the right to earn paid sick leave?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results


 

Does your CEO 'Get it?'

Tell us why on the submission form and your CEO could appear among the 2017 selections.

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today
    Executive/legislative/judicial | Federal agencies | Return to work | Public administration

    Changes to federal worker disability program under debate

    July 10, 2013

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – The Department of Labor claims proposed changes to its Federal Employees’ Compensation Act program would create a more equitable system, but some experts at a July 10 House hearing warned that the changes could drastically affect injured federal workers.

    The proposal would create a uniform compensation level of 70 percent of a recipient’s pre-disability gross wage. This lowers the current rate for recipients with dependents to 75 percent, while increasing the current rate for recipients without dependents to about 66 percent.

    Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs acting Director Gary Steinberg testified before the House Education and the Workforce Committee that the proposed changes would reduce return-to-work disincentives and simplify program administration.

    But a 2012 Government Accountability Office report on the proposal suggests the median take-home pay replaced by FECA for all totally disabled workers would decline to 77 percent from 80 percent.

    The DOL proposal also does not factor in potential career growth and advancement, a point some at the hearing objected. Failing to account for changes in wages throughout a career “provides a misleading picture about the impact of the injury on income,” testified Seth Seabury, an associate professor of research at the University of Southern California’s Department of Emergency Medicine.