NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Should employers' injury and illness data be made public?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results


Does your CEO 'Get it?'

Tell us why on the submission form and your CEO could appear among the 2017 selections.

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    9/11 rescue workers' lungs not recovering: study

    April 15, 2010

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Rescue workers from the New York City Fire Department who suffered acute lung damage after exposure to World Trade Center dust have abnormal lung function seven years later, according to research from the New York-based Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University.

    A study of nearly 13,000 workers found many experienced severe and persistent decline in lung function. The proportion of those who never smoked but had below normal lung function stood at about 13 percent for firefighters and 22 percent for emergency medical services workers by the end of the study, a university press release said. All of the participants had been tested prior to Sept. 11, 2001, allowing for a baseline comparison.

    The research followed up on a 2006 study that found one year after the attack, rescue workers suffered more than 12 times the decline in lung function expected with normal aging. The largest decline occurred among workers who arrived the morning of the attack, when dust was most intense.

    Previous studies have suggested the effects of firefighting on lung damage are mild and reversible; however, researchers speculate the unusual nature of the WTC dust cloud may be responsible for the lack of worker recovery, the release said.

    The study appeared in the April 8 edition of the New England Journal of Medicine.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.