NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Has an employer ever asked you to do something that violated your code of ethics as a safety professional?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today
    Personal protective equipment

    Supreme Court: Workers not entitled to payment for time spent donning PPE

    January 28, 2014

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – Employers do not have to pay workers for time spent putting on and taking off personal protective equipment, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Jan. 27.

    Clifton Sandifer and current and former employees at an Indiana steelmaking facility filed suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act against U.S. Steel, seeking back pay for time spent donning PPE, which the employer requires them to wear.

    In Sandifer et al. versus U.S. Steel Corp., the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed a lower court ruling and said time spent putting on PPE amounted to “changing clothes,” for which employees are not entitled to payment under FLSA. In addition, the court said, such time spent donning PPE was minimal.

    “Even if certain items – the hardhat, glasses, and earplugs – were not ‘clothes,’ the time spent donning and doffing them was ‘de minimis,’ and hence noncompensable,” stated the opinion written by Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.