NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Does your CEO "get it" about the value of worker safety and health?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote Results
Federal agencies | Regulation

OSHA’s ‘sub-regulatory’ actions ignore Congress, stakeholders claim

February 4, 2014

  • / Print
  • Reprints
  • Text Size:
    A A

Washington – Is OSHA overstepping its authority and ignoring congressional mandates? This question was debated at a Feb. 4 House Workforce Protections Subcommittee hearing, during which subcommittee chair Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI) suggested the agency has circumvented the public rulemaking process through several actions that “dramatically” changed existing policies.

Examples given by Walberg include a letter of interpretation allowing union representatives to accompany OSHA inspectors during a workplace walkaround, and a guidance document allowing the inspection of grain facilities on family farms even though farms with 10 or fewer employees are exempt from OSHA enforcement.

However, Randy Rabinowitz, a Washington-based attorney speaking for herself at the hearing, argued that OSHA posed no new legal burdens, and the agency’s recent actions clarified long-standing policies. Specifically, Rabinowitz said, the letter of interpretation reiterates workers’ right to choose a non-employee to represent them during a walkaround inspection, and that the non-employee could be affiliated with a union or a community organization.

Attorney Bradford Hammock, representing the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, disagreed, arguing that such “sub-regulatory” actions change policy with little transparency by avoiding the traditional public-comment approach required for regulations. These actions will appear on OSHA’s website with little to no advance notice, Hammock said.