NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

During your career as a safety professional, has a worker death ever occurred at your site?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote Results

Does your CEO 'Get it?'

Tell us why on the submission form and your CEO could appear among the 2016 selections.

Arizona OSHA to host hearings on residential fall protection

August 3, 2011

  • / Print
  • Reprints
  • Text Size:
    A A

Tucson, AZ – In light of federal OSHA’s delay in enforcing the new residential fall protection directive, the Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and Health is taking the opportunity to host two hearings (.pdf file) on the issue next month, the state agency announced Aug. 1.

ADOSH is scheduled to host informal public meetings Sept. 6 in Phoenix and Sept. 9 in Tucson.

Last December, federal OSHA changed its enforcement policy to require residential construction employers to provide conventional fall protection for employees. Shortly before the agency began enforcing the new directive, OSHA announced it would provide a three-month phase-in period that runs through Sept. 15.

As a State Plan program, ADOSH is required to adopt the new directive or one “at least as effective” as federal OSHA’s. The state agency chose to adopt the federal directive, but held off on enforcing it.

During the hearings, ADOSH will be seeking information on the possible infeasibility of conventional fall protection in residential construction processes, direct and indirect costs of such fall protection, and whether an effective alternative to OSHA’s new directive could be used instead.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.