NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Should employers' injury and illness data be made public?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results


 

Does your CEO 'Get it?'

Tell us why on the submission form and your CEO could appear among the 2017 selections.

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    House Subcommittee discusses CSA improvements

    September 19, 2012

    Tags
    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, trucking industry representatives, law enforcement officials and safety advocates testified Sept. 13 before a House transportation subcommittee on improving FMCSA’s Compliance, Safety, Accountability program.

    In prepared comments (.pdf file) to the House Highways and Transit Subcommittee, FMCSA Administrator Anne S. Ferro testified that recent changes to the program have increased its ability to identify carriers with poor safety and compliance histories.

    Speaking out against CSA, a representative of the Arlington, VA-based American Trucking Associations stated (.pdf file) that the program has yet to achieve its primary goal – predicting carriers’ future crash risk – and called for additional methodology changes.

    Subcommittee Chairman Rep. John J. Duncan Jr. (R-TN) stated in a press release that small trucking companies appear to be underrepresented in the program ratings. The Grain Valley, MO-based Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association submitted comments to the hearing stating that small businesses receive a rating only after being cited for a violation during an inspection. This ignores carriers that have not had an inspection, have a clean record or have had no violations cited during inspections, OOIDA claims.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.