NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Has an employer ever asked you to do something that violated your code of ethics as a safety professional?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    OSHA agenda moves forward on hazcom, delays combustible dust rule

    January 25, 2012

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – Plans for OSHA standards on diacetyl, combustible dust and beryllium appear to be placed on hold.

    The three rules had been in development for more than two years, but all are now in the “long-term action” stage in the fall 2011 Regulatory Agenda, which was released Jan. 20. No additional details on the rules were provided, including upcoming regulatory actions, and an OSHA spokesperson could not immediately provide a comment on the delay.

    Other initiatives are moving forward, however. Final actions on the Hazard Communication Standard and a notice of proposed rulemaking on crystalline silica – both of which seek to update current regulations – are expected to be issued in February.

    According to the agenda, OSHA also plans to seek public input on the best way to address occupational exposure to chemicals and is revisiting two provisions of its 2008 Longshoring Vertical Tandem Lifts standard that were overturned by an appellate court.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.