On Safety

The "On Safety" blog has been discontinued.

OSHA Roundup for Feb. 16, 2015

February 16, 2015
Reprints

News

Efforts to strengthen workplace safety regulations and increase fines in Wyoming die in the state legislature.

OSHA issues a health warning about fumigants in the grain industry.

Notable proposed fines

$179,000 to a trucking company in Ohio for permit-required confined spaces and fall hazard violations cited for allegedly failing to test and properly vent the atmosphere while cleaning transport tankers

$119,000 to a St. Louis-based trucking terminal for propane hazards in connection with an explosion that injured four workers

$114,800 to an Indiana-based communication tower maintenance company for fall protection violations related to a painter’s fatal fall at an Illinois worksite

$108,800 to an automotive product manufacturing facility in Maine for guarding violations that put workers at risk of lacerations and amputations

$7,600 to a Nebraska roofing company for failing to provide fall protection to two workers who later suffered a 16-foot fall, killing one and injuring the other


Review Counter

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of Feb. 16:

# of Days OSHA Proposal
 
165 Occupational Exposure to Beryllium (proposed rule)
94 Confined Spaces in Construction (final rule)

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.

The opinions expressed in "On Safety" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)