On Safety

The "On Safety" blog has been discontinued.

OSHA Roundup for April 20, 2015

April 20, 2015
Reprints

News

A new Request for Information from OSHA seeks input on how communication tower workers can be better protected from hazards.

OSHA is offering $3.5 million in grant funding for nonprofit organizations developing or running safety training programs.

Confused about California OSHA’s new heat illness prevention rules? Check out a guidance document that the agency recently issued.

Notable proposed fines

$171,000 to an industrial dryer manufacturer in Chicago for guarding, powered industrial truck, electrical and training violations

$136,000 to an Ohio metal scrap recycler and its parent company for electrical violations related to the electrocution of a welder

$105,200 to a Fort Edward, NY-based petroleum industry parts manufacturer for a variety of fire- and explosion-related hazards, including allegations of combustible dust, locked and obstructed exit routes, and improperly stored flammable liquids

$90,000 to a utility company in Florida for several violations related to de-energized circuit testing and transformer grounding after an apprentice was electrocuted while repairing transformers

$80,500 to an Ohio iron and steel forging company for machine guarding and training violations after a worker’s fingertip was cut off

$16,800 to an Idaho trucking company for lockout/tagout and other violations related to a truck fatally crushing a mechanic

$9,800 to an Idaho salvage yard for lockout/tagout and powered industrial truck violations cited after a worker was crushed by a van

Happening this week

April 20-21 – OSHA Whistleblower Protection Advisory Committee meeting

Review Counter

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of April 20:

# of Days OSHA Proposal
 
228 Occupational Exposure to Beryllium (proposed rule)

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.

The opinions expressed in "On Safety" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)