On Safety

The "On Safety" blog has been discontinued.

OSHA Roundup for Jan. 11, 2016

January 11, 2016
Reprints

News

The Department of Labor’s claim that the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission can impose enterprise-wide abatement may proceed to trial, an administrative law judge recently ruled.

Do you have something to say about OSHA’s proposed beryllium rule? Let them hear it.

Notable proposed fines

$162,800 to a discount chain store in Texas for allegedly failing to keep unobstructed exit routes and store aisles, as well as ensuring a clear working space around an electrical panel

$152,460 to a New Hampshire roofing contractor for fall protection, guarding and scaffolding violations

$140,000 to a Pennsylvania bridge repair company for cave-in protection violations following a fatal trench collapse

$115,500 to a roofing company in Florida for fall protection violations

$53,900 to a Florida framing contractor for fall protection violations related to the 19-foot fatal fall of a worker at a residential construction site

Review Counter

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of Jan. 11:

# of Days OSHA Proposal
 
98 Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses (final rule)
21 Silica (final rule)

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.

The opinions expressed in "On Safety" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)