On Safety

Sign up to be notified by email about new posts on this blog.

Subscribe to the RSS feed

OSHA Roundup for April 8, 2013

April 8, 2013

Review counter

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of today:

# of Days
784 Silica (proposed rule)
503 Modernizing OSHA’s reporting system for injuries and illnesses (proposed rule)
285 Electric power transmission and distribution; electrical protective equipment (final rule)

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.


The Protecting America’s Workers Act – which would provide the OSH Act’s first significant update – has been reintroduced in the Senate.

OSHA meets with the National Industrial Sand Association regarding the agency’s proposed silica rule.

President Barack Obama re-nominates Cynthia Attwood to serve on the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

OSHA issues a combustible dust booklet for emergency responders.

Notable proposed fines

$115,500 to a Kansas roofing contractor in connection with an incident in which a worker fell from a roof, broke his neck and was paralyzed

$110,440 to an Illinois sewer and water contractor for allegations of failing to protect workers from a cave-in and moving soil and chunks of asphalt during trenching operations

$109,800 to a Houston-based precast firm for alleged electrical and fall hazards

$83,160 to a Georgia metal finishing company for allegations of workers being exposed to dangerous chemical levels

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)