On Safety

Sign up to be notified by email about new posts on this blog.

Subscribe to the RSS feed

OSHA Roundup for Dec. 3, 2012

December 3, 2012

Review counter

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of today:

# of Days
658 Silica (proposed rule)
377 Modernizing OSHA’s reporting system for injuries and illnesses (proposed rule)
159 Electric power transmission and distribution; electrical protective equipment (final rule)

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.


The Office of Management and Budget has completed a review of Standards Improvement Project IV, a rule that would update and streamline several construction standards.

Several free OSHA guidance documents have been updated.

Notable proposed fines

$545,000 to an Ohio chemical facility in connection to the release of hazardous materials that led to a plant evacuation and closure of a nearby interstate

$165,900 to a Mississippi phosphate producer in connection to the deaths of two workers, both of whom were killed when struck by flying metal debris in separate incidents

$130,900 (.pdf file) to a warehouse company in New Jersey for allegations that include fall hazards and allowing workers to ride on forklifts

$118,000 to a New York bakery for alleged hazards such as inadequate machine guarding and a lack of lockout/tagout procedures

$77,000 to a Georgia chemical manufacturer in connection with a plant explosion

The opinions expressed in "Washington Wire" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)