On Safety

Sign up to be notified by email about new posts on this blog.

Subscribe to the RSS feed

OSHA Roundup for Feb. 11, 2013

February 11, 2013

Review counter

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of today:

# of Days
728 Silica (proposed rule)
447 Modernizing OSHA’s reporting system for injuries and illnesses (proposed rule)
229 Electric power transmission and distribution; electrical protective equipment (final rule)

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.


OSHA retains David Michaels as administrator.

A Senate proposal would require government agencies to assess the effect proposed and existing regulations have on the economy.

OSHA schedules a public hearing on proposed changes to its Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory Program.

Notable proposed fines

$274,500 to a Wisconsin iron foundry for allegedly exposing workers to respirable dust

$129,745 to a Pennsylvania soft drink company for alleged repeat violations of electrical hazards, and lack of noise and engineering controls, among other hazards

$123,000 to an upstate New York manufacturer of roof panels for allegations of a deficient process safety management program and other violations

Happening this week

Feb. 14 – A monthlong, OSHA-sponsored safety stand-down kicks off for the oil and gas industry in the Montana-North Dakota Bakken Basin.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)