NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

On Safety

Kyle Morrison's blog

A blog by Safety+Health Senior Associate Editor Kyle W. Morrison


kyle.morrison@nsc.org


Sign up to be notified by email about new posts on this blog.


Subscribe to the RSS feed


OSHA Roundup for Feb. 18, 2013

February 18, 2013

Tags
  • / Print
  • Reprints
  • Text Size:
    A A

Review counter

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of today:

# of Days
735 Silica (proposed rule)
454 Modernizing OSHA’s reporting system for injuries and illnesses (proposed rule)
236 Electric power transmission and distribution; electrical protective equipment (final rule)

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.

News

I2P2 will remain OSHA’s No. 1 priority, agency chief David Michaels says.

OSHA moves forward with a digger-derrick exemption for its Cranes and Derricks in Construction Standard with a notice of proposed rulemaking.

OSHA issues technical amendments for its Hazard Communication Standard.

Mandatory settlement talks help, according to a study evaluating the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission’s mediation process.

Notable proposed fines

$192,000 to a Florida alcohol manufacturer in connection with the death of a temporary worker, who was crushed on his first day on the job

$129,500 to a Dallas tortilla manufacturing facility for allegations of repeat safety violations that include failure to provide quick-drench eyewash facilities and failure to ensure proper polarity for electrical receptacles and use of protective footwear

The opinions expressed in "Washington Wire" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.