NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

On Safety

Kyle Morrison's blog

A blog by Safety+Health Senior Associate Editor Kyle W. Morrison


kyle.morrison@nsc.org


Sign up to be notified by email about new posts on this blog.


Subscribe to the RSS feed


OSHA Roundup for Sept. 9, 2013

September 9, 2013

  • / Print
  • Reprints
  • Text Size:
    A A

News

A coalition of 15 advocacy groups petition OSHA to set a standard limiting line speeds in poultry and meatpacking facilities.

A new coalition composed of construction trade associations intends to work with OSHA on developing a final silica rule.

OSHA – along with the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives – issue a chemical advisory on ammonium nitrate hazards.

Notable proposed fines

$262,000 to an Illinois paint product manufacturer for locked door and blocked exit violations stemming from an explosion and fire in which three workers were injured

$185,560 to a paper and cardboard manufacturer in Wisconsin for violations related to the ignition of flammable vapors that severely burned a worker

$51,800 to a St. Louis industrial steel manufacturer in connection with an employee’s electrocution


Review Counter

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of Sept. 9:

# of Days OSHA Proposal
 
657 Modernizing OSHA’s reporting system for injuries and illnesses (proposed rule)
439 Electric power transmission and distribution; electrical protective equipment (final rule)

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.

The opinions expressed in "Washington Wire" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.