Incentives

Safety incentive programs

When done correctly, they can boost workplace safety, experts say

Reprints
Safety incentives
Photo: RicardoImagen/iStockphoto

Page 2 of 2

‘Keeping people aware’

One issue with incentive programs is they can go stale and employees can lose interest if companies don’t change things up from time to time, Lapidus noted. That includes the incentives.

Along with providing top-down recognition, C.A. Short advises having a way for employees to praise each other. It also helps to have buy-in and continuous support from management.

Lee said that an incentive program is one piece of the pie or one piece of the puzzle along with aspects such as training, policies or procedures.

As the final piece of the pie, safety incentive programs provide the “human element,” according to C.A. Short, and bring higher levels of awareness to the other pieces.

“What’s the reason for an incentive program? I think it’s for keeping people aware that they need to work in a safe manner,” Lapidus said. “Why do you need incentive programs? It’s just another tool to get both management and employees to be more aware of what they need to do.”

OSHA’s take on incentive programs

In a series of three evolving memos over the past decade, OSHA has addressed incentive programs that may discourage injury reporting.

The first memo, issued in March 2012, deemed those types of incentive programs “problematic” under section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. Taking away an incentive for reporting an injury “could be considered unlawful discrimination” against an employee.

Warehouse workers

Photo: RicardoImagen/iStockphoto

“If the incentive is great enough that its loss dissuades reasonable workers from reporting injuries, the program would result in the employer’s failure to record injuries that it is required to record under Part 1904 (of OSHA’s regulations). In this case, the employer is violating that rule, and a referral for a recordkeeping investigation should be made,” the memo states.

Responding to an email from Safety+Health, former OSHA Assistant Labor Secretary David Michaels wrote that the reaction to the memo was mixed. “Some corporate stakeholders” were critical, but others, including the agency’s “Electrical Transmission partnership” and “most unions and public health groups,” supported it. Some employers interpreted the memo as OSHA no longer allowing any type of incentive programs.

The agency attempted to clarify its stance in October 2016 after publishing its Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses final rule in May of that same year.

The agency stated that 1904.35(b)(1)(iv) in the final rule didn’t prohibit safety incentive programs. However, withholding a benefit such as a cash prize or “other substantial award” because an employee reported an injury would violate that regulation.

In October 2018, under the Trump administration, OSHA issued a memo stating employers could have rate-based programs as long as those programs “are not implemented in a manner that discourages reporting.”

Withholding a prize or bonus because of a reported injury is allowed “as long as the employer has implemented adequate precautions to ensure employees feel free to report an injury or illness.”

The memo states: “An employer could avoid any inadvertent deterrent effects of a rate-based incentive program by taking positive steps to create a workplace culture that emphasizes safety, not just rates.”

Under the Biden administration, OSHA is reviewing that guidance “to determine whether it provides necessary information to employers about how to incentivize safety in the workplace without disincentivizing the reporting of injuries,” an agency spokesperson told S+H.

An OSHA rule to “memoralize” its positions on safety incentive programs and post-incident drug testing was moved to long-term actions in the new administration’s first regulatory agenda, released in June. That means no action is expected anytime in the near future.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)