S+H Staff

Washington — The National Transportation Safety Board has announced that three more recommendations from its 2019-2020 Most Wanted List of Transportation Safety Improvements have been implemented, boosting the total number of recommendations fulfilled to 38.

Occupational safety and health pros weigh in on the current job market, as well as whether the COVID-19 pandemic will have a lasting impact on the profession.

“This is a moment in time that will not only shape the future of your company, but your future as a leader,” says Don Martin, senior vice president and executive consultant at DEKRA Organizational Safety and Reliability.

Portland, OR-based KEEN Inc. recently launched the “Together We Can Help” initiative so that its customers around the world could give a free pair of shoes to individuals directly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Lafayette, CO-based KPA has released a COVID-19 Coronavirus Resources Center for employers needing information to help keep their workforce healthy and safe.

The Board of Certified Safety Professionals, headquartered in Indianapolis, has been closely monitoring the COVID-19 pandemic and is aware of the ways in which it has negatively impacted its certificants’ ability to earn recertification points.

I understand the importance of positive communication in safety, but how do I educate frontline supervisors about avoiding the “blame game” when discussing safety issues with workers?

In an effort to help health care providers and workers provide patients with the urgent care and testing they need during the COVID-19 pandemic, Oak Creek, WI-based Master Lock Co. LLC recently concluded a donation program that provided free smart locks or lock boxes to secure critical personal protective equipment.

Chicago-based VelocityEHS, a global provider of cloud-based environmental, health, safety and sustainability solutions, has developed a free COVID-19 resource to provide employers with information they need to help keep their workers safe and healthy during the pandemic

Is the “one size smaller” rule for women’s personal protective equipment adequate?