OSHA Infographics Federal agencies Statistics Fines/penalties

OSHA’s Top 10 most-cited violations for fiscal year 2017

Reprints

Penalty Box

The list of OSHA’s proposed monetary penalties in fiscal year 2017 comprises those stemming from a single incident or related incidents in which one or more companies are alleged to have failed to adhere to safe work practices. This failure puts workers at risk – in some cases fatally. The following information is gathered from OSHA enforcement press releases issued by federal OSHA between Oct. 1, 2016, and Sept. 30, 2017.

(Note: Dollar amounts may be reduced as part of a settlement agreement or litigation.)

$2.6 million

Companies: Joon LLC (operating as Ajin USA), Alliance HR Inc. (operating as Alliance Total Solutions LLC) and Joynus Staffing Corp.
Location: Cusseta, AL (OSHA Region 4)
Business types: Auto parts supplier, staffing agencies
Inspection trigger: Worker fatality
Event: A worker was crushed to death while clearing a sensor fault in a robotic conveyor belt for a manufacturer that stamps metal parts for certain automobile manufacturers. The worker and three colleagues entered a robotic station when the robot suddenly restarted, trapping the worker inside the machine. OSHA alleges that Ajin USA failed to use energy control procedures to prevent machinery from starting during maintenance and servicing. The company also exposed employees to crushing and amputation hazards as a result of improper machine guarding and did not provide safety locks to isolate hazardous energy.
Major citations: In total, Joon LLC was cited for 23 willful, serious and other-than-serious violations, including 19 egregious instance-by-instance willful violations. OSHA also cited staffing agencies Alliance HR and Joynus Staffing for two serious violations apiece.

“This senseless tragedy could have been prevented if [the victim’s] employers had followed proper safety precautions.” – David Michaels, former OSHA administrator

$1.5 million

Company: Atlantic Drain Service Co., Inc.
Location: Boston (OSHA Region 1)
Business type: Drain cleaning
Inspection trigger: Two worker fatalities
Event: Two workers drowned after a trench collapsed, breaking an adjacent fire hydrant line and instantly flooding the trench. An investigation determined that the employer did not provide basic safeguards against collapse or offer employee training for recognizing and avoiding cave-in and other hazards associated with trenching and excavation work. OSHA previously cited Atlantic Drain Service worksites for similar hazards in 2007 and 2012.
Major citations: In total, Atlantic Drain Service was cited for 18 serious, willful, repeat and other-than-serious violations.

“The deaths of these two men could have and should have been prevented. Their employer, which previously had been cited by OSHA for the same hazardous conditions, knew what safeguards were needed to protect its employees but chose to ignore that responsibility.” – Galen Blanton, OSHA New England regional administrator

$1.5 million

Company: Great White Construction Inc.
Location: St. Augustine, FL (OSHA Region 4)
Business type: Construction
Inspection trigger: Planned inspection
Event: An inspector reported witnessing employees removing shingles and plywood sheeting from the roof of a multistory residential building without using proper fall protection. The workers’ harnesses were not tied off to the rope grabs and roof anchors. OSHA launched a second inspection immediately after and observed other employees operating under similar conditions at a nearby Great White worksite.
Major citations: Great White Construction was cited for 11 willful citations for failure to protect employees from fall hazards. The company also was cited for three repeat violations for failure to ensure employees wore eye protection while using nail guns and exposing employees to fall hazards when using ladders for roof access. OSHA placed the company in its Severe Violator Enforcement Program.

“In the past five years, Great White Construction’s series of willful, serious and repeat violations has demonstrated indifference toward the safety of their employees. The company allowed their employees to work without fall protection and made no reasonable effort to eliminate the hazard.” – Kurt Petermeyer, OSHA regional administrator in Atlanta

$714,142

Company: Arrow Plumbing LLC
Location: Blue Springs, MO (OSHA Region 7)
Business type: Plumbing
Inspection trigger: Worker fatality
Event: Inspectors determined that a worker was operating in an unprotected trench only one month after another worker died when a trench collapsed under similar conditions. OSHA found that, in both cases, Arrow Plumbing did not provide basic safeguards to prevent a trench collapse and failed to train employees to recognize and avoid cave-in and related hazards.
Major citations: Arrow Plumbing was cited for six willful and eight serious violations.

“We call on all employers involved in excavation work to review their safety procedures and to ensure that all workers are properly protected and trained on the job.” – Kim Stille, OSHA regional administrator in Kansas City, MO

$610,034

Company: Amsted Rail Co. Inc.
Location: Groveport, OH (OSHA Region 5)
Business type: Steel freight component manufacturer
Inspection trigger: Worker injury
Event: An employee suffered a crushed leg after becoming caught in a core baker machine while performing maintenance. A follow-up investigation showed numerous machine safety violations, including failure to lock out machinery during servicing. Less than two months later, OSHA opened a second investigation after finding four incidents of workers exposed to silica at amounts greater than the permissible exposure limit.
Major citations: Amsted Rail Co. was cited for six repeat, 19 serious and five other-than-serious violations over the two inspections. OSHA placed the company in its Severe Violator Enforcement Program.

“Companies must ensure their workers are trained in proper machine safety procedures and provide the necessary personal protective equipment to prevent injuries and illness on the job. Continuous monitoring of facilities and procedures are important components of an effective safety and health program.” – Dorothy Dougherty, former OSHA deputy assistant secretary of labor for occupational safety and health

$569,463

Company: Autoneum North America Inc.
Location: Oregon, OH (OSHA Region 5)
Business type: Auto insulation manufacturer
Inspection trigger: Worker amputation
Event: A worker’s arm became caught while feeding waste materials into a shredding machine, resulting in the amputation of the worker’s right hand and wrist, as well as part of the forearm. OSHA cited the company for inadequate machine safety procedures, including failure to lock out equipment to prevent unintentional energization and exposing employees to struck-by hazards from machine components.
Major citations: Autoneum North America was cited for three willful and two repeated violations.

“This incident illustrates why companies must evaluate machine safety procedures to ensure they are adequate and effective in protecting workers from injuries on the job. In addition to being the law and the right thing to do, safe workplaces are an important component in supporting and sustaining job growth in America.” – Dorothy Dougherty, former OSHA deputy assistant secretary of labor for occupational safety and health

$536,249

Company: Milark Industries Inc.
Location: Mansfield, OH (OSHA Region 5)
Business type: Automobile, motorcycle and appliance part manufacturer
Inspection trigger: Worker amputation and machine-related injuries
Event: OSHA found that a lack of adequate machine safeguarding contributed to various injuries, including those to a temporary worker who suffered partial amputation to two fingers on his left hand on his first day of work. Violations included failure to lock out robotic welding cells and tube bender and provide training for lockout/tagout; bypassing safety interlocks to maintain production rate; and bypassing safety devices during maintenance. OSHA has inspected Milark Industries 10 times since 2007.
Major citations: Milark Industries was cited for three willful egregious, one willful and three serious violations. The company was placed in OSHA’s Severe Violator Enforcement Program.

“Milark Industries continues to create an environment where employees are allowed to bypass machine safety procedures, and are threatened to be disciplined if they don’t meet the production quotas. By doing so, the company is creating an unacceptable culture of risk and getting people hurt on the job.” – Kim Nelson, OSHA area director in Toledo, OH

$535,411

Company: Big Tex Trailer Manufacturing Inc. (operates as CM Truck Beds)
Location: Kingston, OK (OSHA Region 6)
Business type: Truck bed manufacturer
Inspection trigger: Complaint
Event: OSHA inspectors found that Big Tex workers involved in spray painting and power coating operations did not undergo required medical evaluation and respirator fit testing. The company also repeatedly failed to proof test chain slings and offer welding protection.
Major citations: CM Truck Beds was cited for 20 serious, one willful and three repeated violations.

“CM Truck Beds has created an environment where workers may be seriously injured or killed, as the scope of these violations clearly shows.” – David Bates, OSHA area director in Oklahoma City

$526,633

Company: Prinz Grain & Feed Inc.
Location: West Point, NE (OSHA Region 7)
Business type: Animal feed
Inspection trigger: Worker fatality
Event: A grain bin collapsed as a maintenance employee cleared crusted corn from the sides, engulfing the worker in hundreds of pounds of grain. He was rescued by emergency crews but died two days later. OSHA found that Prinz Grain & Feed failed to perform a number of tasks, including issuing confined space permits for entry into grain bins and pits; implementing lockout/tagout procedures; and training workers in confined space entry, grain handling hazards and OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard.
Major citations: Prinz Grain & Feed was cited for three willful, 15 serious and two other-than-serious violations. OSHA placed the company in its Severe Violator Enforcement Program.

“An ‘engulfment’ often happens when ‘bridged’ grain and vertical piles of stored grain collapse unexpectedly, as in this tragic case. The density, weight and unpredictable behavior of flowing grains make it nearly impossible for workers to rescue themselves without help. In more than 60 percent of grain engulfments, workers suffer fatal injuries. OSHA urges employers and workers in this hazardous industry to review and implement OSHA’s grain-handling standards to prevent injuries and loss of lives.” – Kim Stille, OSHA regional administrator in Kansas City, MO

$503,380

Company: BWAY Corp.
Location: Chicago (OSHA Region 5)
Business type: Manufacturer of rigid metal, plastic and hybrid containers
Inspection trigger: Worker injuries
Event: OSHA investigated four separate reports of employee injuries prompted by inadequate machine safety procedures, including failure to train in lockout/tagout procedures and providing insufficient machine guarding on a mechanical power press, belts and pulleys, and chains and sprockets. Three workers suffered amputations stemming from unguarded chain and sprocket assembly. Another worker suffered two broken bones when machinery crushed his hand. According to OSHA, 15 workers at the plant have suffered amputations in the past five years.
Major citations: BWAY Corp. was cited for five repeated and five serious safety violations of machine safety procedures. The company was placed in OSHA’s Severe Violator Enforcement Program.

“Lack of machine safety guards and procedures contribute to multiple employee injuries nationwide each year. Companies must continuously monitor their facilities, and review procedures and training to ensure employees are protected from machine hazards.” – Kathy Webb, OSHA area director in Chicago

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)