NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Should employers' injury and illness data be made public?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results


Does your CEO 'Get it?'

Tell us why on the submission form and your CEO could appear among the 2017 selections.

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today
    State Plan states | Federal agencies

    OSHA releases annual State Plan evaluations

    August 22, 2014

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – Federal OSHA has published its latest annual reports evaluating each of the 27 State Plan states.

    The new Federal Annual Monitoring and Evaluation Reports cover fiscal year 2013, which ran from Oct. 1, 2012, through Sept. 30, 2013. Highlights from the various reports include:

    • California is understaffed, has a low rate of serious violations, and experiences a long period between an inspection and issuance of a citation.
    • Hawaii, which is sharing jurisdiction with federal OSHA while working to improve its program, has made progress but still experiences program management and enforcement issues.
    • In a turnabout after receiving sharp criticism several years ago for a number of construction fatalities, Nevada’s program is considered “effective,” albeit with a need to improve staff retention and supervisory oversight.

    State-run occupational safety and health programs must be “at least as effective” as federal OSHA. However, some stakeholders have voiced concerns at the lack of a definition and measurements for the term.