NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Has an employer ever asked you to do something that violated your code of ethics as a safety professional?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    CSB case study includes recommendations on hazardous waste

    July 29, 2010

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    A Chemical Safety Board accident case study released July 21 calls for better safety standards for hazardous waste processing, handling and storage facilities, as well as revision of fire protection codes.

    The case study (.pdf file) examines the 2009 explosion at the Veolia ES Technical Solutions LLC facility in West Carrollton, OH, that injured four workers and damaged eight plant structures and about 20 homes and businesses.

    According to a CSB press release, the explosion occurred when flammable vapor released from a waste recycling process ignited. OSHA had previously cited the company for inadequate attention to process safety management.

    Among CSB's recommendations:

    • Veolia, which plans to rebuild the plant, should restrict occupancy in buildings near the operating plant to trained personnel.
    • The National Fire Protection Association should require companies to use engineering analyses to determine a safe distance between buildings occupied by non-essential personnel and buildings with potentially hazardous process equipment.
    • The Environmental Technology Council, a hazardous waste industry trade group, should petition NFPA to develop guidance on reducing fires, explosions and releases at hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.