NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Has an employer ever asked you to do something that violated your code of ethics as a safety professional?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    Main: MSHA has improved, but new legislation still needed

    March 4, 2011

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – The Mine Safety and Health Administration has made internal improvements in the wake of the Upper Big Branch Mine-South tragedy, but some necessary changes will require new legislation, MSHA administrator Joseph A. Main recently told congressional leaders.

    Main testified March 3 before the House Education and the Workforce Committee’s Workforce Protections Subcommittee on recent regulatory and enforcement actions MSHA has taken.

    Responding to concerns from some committee members about recent audits that indicated poor operation at the agency, Main said MSHA has implemented changes that include new training for supervisors and a complete review of the inspector program.

    Despite the improvements the agency has taken internally, some necessary measures fall outside MSHA’s jurisdiction and require legislative changes, Main said. “There’s only so much we can do through regulations,” he said.

    Main called on Congress to improve the pattern-of-violations statute, simplify the injunctive relief statute, strengthen penalty provisions for violations and draft additional whistleblower protection legislation.

    Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI), subcommittee chair, favors mine safety reform, but expressed a desire to wait for the Upper Big Branch investigations to be completed. Main said those results could be several months away.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.