NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Is the term "accident" acceptable, or should "incident" always be used?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    DOT releases draft rule on rear-view visibility

    March 30, 2011

    Tags
    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – The Department of Transportation on March 23 released a draft (.pdf file) of its proposed rear-view visibility rule during a hearing that attracted families who have lost loved ones to back-over motor vehicle incidents.

    Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood later wrote in a blog post that the rule would eliminate blind zones as part of an effort to prevent cars from backing over pedestrians. At the hearing, he said an average of nearly 300 fatalities and 18,000 injuries occur each year, and a disproportionate number are toddlers and the elderly, according to a press release.

    The yet-to-be-published NPRM was required by Congress as part of the Cameron Gulbransen Kids Transportation Safety Act, which requires the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to amend rear-view visibility standards. The act was named after a 2-year-old who died after his father accidentally backed over him with an SUV.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.