NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Is the term "accident" acceptable, or should "incident" always be used?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    MSHA to use new procedures to reduce contested citations backlog

    December 7, 2011

    Tags
    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Arlington, VA – The Mine Safety and Health Administration on Dec. 1 announced new procedures aimed at reducing the backlog of violations being reviewed by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission.

    The new procedures will allow mine operators to request a conference with local MSHA staff on a contested citation or order before MSHA has assessed a penalty. Currently, operators and miners’ representatives in most MSHA districts may request a conference only after MSHA has proposed the penalty; settlements require FMSHRC approval.

    The new procedures are based on a pilot program (.pdf file) that found a high resolution rate among mine operators that requested pre-assessment conferences.

    Beginning in January 2012, each MSHA district will determine when to implement the procedures based on its available resources, the agency said.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.