NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Should employers' injury and illness data be made public?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    Happy birthday, OMB review of crystalline silica

    February 13, 2012

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Whenever I write about Office of Management and Budget reviews for potential standards, I say it’s a process that “typically” takes 90 days. But that process has become anything but typical in light of OMB’s yearlong review of OSHA’s Crystalline Silica Standard.

    Submitted for review Feb. 14, 2011, the rule would update OSHA’s current rules, which are based on decades-old science and are inadequate to protect workers, according to many stakeholders (.pdf file).

    Celeste Monforton, a professional lecturer in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at George Washington University, has closely followed the silica rulemaking. Since a 1993 presidential order (.pdf file) has been in place requiring significant rules to undergo OMB review, Monforton told me she doesn’t know of another example of a draft proposed rule from OSHA being held this long.

    “A yearlong review of a draft proposed OSHA rule is unprecedented,” said Monforton, a former Department of Labor employee who also writes on health and safety matters for The Pump Handle.

    OSHA’s regulatory agenda now puts publication of the proposed rule this month. But considering how often the rule has already been delayed and the recent general slowdown of regulations, I’m not holding my breath.

    The opinions expressed in "Washington Wire" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.