NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Should all workers have the right to earn paid sick leave?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results


Does your CEO 'Get it?'

Tell us why on the submission form and your CEO could appear among the 2017 selections.

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today
    Trucking | Hours of service

    Bill would halt new HOS ‘restart’ restriction until further study

    November 6, 2013

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – Legislation introduced in the House Oct. 30 would put on hold new restrictions on when commercial truck drivers can “restart” their weekly maximum driving hours – until an independent study is conducted.

    The bill would direct the Government Accountability Office to conduct a study on the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s rationale behind including the restart restrictions in its hours-of-service rule, which went into effect July 1. Since that date, truck drivers have been limited to once-a-week use of a previously unrestricted 34-hour rest period option to reset their weekly maximum driving hours, with two mandatory periods of rest between 1 a.m. and 5 a.m.

    “When [FMCSA] went ahead with its changes to the restart rule, it did so without waiting for essential research to be completed,” Bill Graves, president and CEO of the American Trucking Associations – which originally opposed the changes – said in a press release. “This bill would simply do what should have been done in the first place: delay implementation until we really know the true operational impacts, costs and safety benefits.”

    At press time, the bill had been referred to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.