NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Safety pros: Do you have to fight the perception among front-line workers that safety is “uncool”?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, oil and gas
  • Office safety tips
  • Safety for health care workers
  • Transportation
  • Worker health and wellness
  • Subscribe today

    FRA extends comment period for rail-grade crossing rule

    January 21, 2010

    Tags
    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    The Federal Railroad Administration plans to extend the comment period on a proposed rule officials claim will reduce collisions at rail-grade crossings in 10 states.

    According to a notice (.pdf file) in the Jan. 15 Federal Register, the comment period will reopen Feb. 22 -- and written comments must be received by March 8 -- for a notice of proposed rulemaking that would require the 10 states that have experienced the most highway rail-grade crossing collisions over the past three years to develop action plans to prevent such collisions.

    From 2006 to 2008, rail-grade crossing collisions in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Ohio and Texas accounted for 4,200 accidents (51 percent of all rail-grade crossing collisions nationwide). Those states would have one year after the NPRM goes into effect to develop federally compliant five-year action plans.



    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.