NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Has an employer ever asked you to do something that violated your code of ethics as a safety professional?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    Proposed rule would update OSHA standards

    July 8, 2010

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    In a move OSHA said would update and remove inconsistent or duplicative standards, the agency has issued a proposed rule (.pdf file) that would revise or eliminate requirements in several standards.

    The Standards Improvement Project -- Phase III affects many standards, from those in general industry to construction and maritime. Some changes would be more cosmetic, such as altering the title of Subpart E in the general industry standards (29 CFR Part 1910) from "Means of Egress" to "Exit Routes and Emergency Planning."

    Other changes would clarify employer responsibilities by eliminating confusing language. For example, language explaining the trigger levels for monitoring in the general industry lead standard (1910.1025) is clarified: The standard currently says certain monitoring is required when levels are "above" the permissible exposure limit, and the proposed changes would tweak that requirement to when levels are "at or above" the PEL.

    Comments on the proposed rule are being accepted until Sept. 30.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.